03.25.09
Social network sites ‘monitored’
The Home Office said it was needed to tackle crime gangs and terrorists who might use the sites, but said it would not keep the content of conversations.
Civil liberties campaigners have called the proposal a “snoopers’ charter”.”
I’m normally the first person to moan about the government taking liberties with our privacy, but in this case I see no problem. After all social network sites only have the data that you wish to place on them. If you don’t want people looking in your living room you put up net curtains, if you don’t want people looking at your personal data you don’t join a social network site.
The government is attacking our civil liberties in much more insidious manners than just looking at data which we choose to provide to a website.
For example, there is a certain expectation of privacy when you send an email but the government want to snoop on them, just like we don’t expect our paper based mail to be opened and read.
12.23.08
Hiatus
This blog will be on hiatus until the new year while I consider my future and the future direction of this blog.
It should be interesting…
Happy holidays.
11.20.08
Monty Python And Modern Distribution
Give stuff away and people will buy the physical product.
Another example would be Freakangels, give away the episodes and people will buy the bound book.
Technorati Tags: ORG, freestuff, montypython, commonsenseapproachtosellingthings
11.09.08
I Know I Shouldn’t Find It Funny…
…But I do.
Monks, the epitome of peaceful contemplation, love and harmony having a right old ding-dong just like the drunks that I find fighting outside pubs every night.
Technorati Tags: religioushypocrisy, monks, mighttheybedrunkonthecommunionwine
11.05.08
Burn A Catholic Day
As today is national ‘Burn A Catholic Day‘ brought about by a failed plot to blow up parliament, might I suggest that in the spirit of inclusion we also have a ‘Burn a Christian‘ day and ‘Burn a Muslim day‘?
Only seems fair in this more tolerant time of equal opportunities…
10.03.08
Connecting For Health Consultation
I’ve spoken before on the ‘Connecting for Health’ IT project, its something that frankly gives me the willies; a huge database of all your medical details that has shockingly bad security measures.
(I’ve spoken to people working on the system, and trust me, it’s horrendously insecure).
They are having a consultation process on the use of your medical information, which you can take part in on-line.
The health and well-being of the population can be improved by activities such as medical research, disease surveillance, screening, needs assessment and preventative activities.
NHS CFH is keen to obtain the views of the general public, patients and other interested parties on how patient information held by the NHS should be used for additional purposes such as research.
I suggest that everyone in the UK has a look at it.
From the Open Rights Group mailing list I’m part of, someone has made the following point.
Note that the survey more than once claims that patients have no legal right to control information they have given the NHS about themselves once it has been anonymised.
As a matter of law this is nonsense.
Information given in confidence may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it was supplied unless the supplier consents, and this is not changed by removing the supplier’s name. So I hope responders will challenge this (and perhaps also the blithe claim that
anonymisation only fails in the case of people with very rare diseases, which greatly understates the risk that an aggregation of conditions,
dates and places will identify someone just as plainly as a name and address).
This is just exactly the sort of function creep that I mentioned in the previous post, please go and have your own say about your data being used in this fashion.
Oh, and you folks do me proud. If anyone else wants to join up (I do recommend it, I’m a proud supporter, and you can see the sorts of bright people we have involved) you can find out more here. These folks do good work that you can help support for less than the price of two pints of lager.
09.28.08
How To Lose Sales And Alienate People
I do so love my Sony e-reader, it’s small, it’s tough and the text display is very much like paper. With it I can sling it in my bag and have a large chunk of my library with me at any one time.
For a while it was only available in America which is where I bought mine. I then waited what seemed like an eternity for it to be released over here in the UK.
In America there is a lovely big library of books you can download electronically and until Waterstones fired up their version of the e-book library over here in the UK the only books I could (legally) read on my reader were those either in the Public Domain, or licensed under the Creative Commons license.
So I was hoping for big things from the Waterstones launch.
The Waterstones website is not as slick or intuitive as the Sony’s American ebook library. To search for specific e-books as opposed to paperback or hardback formats, you need to hit the ‘advanced search’ button. The ebook minisite’s search bar will, by default, search the whole of the site.
For an example, if you go to the Waterstones ebook site and search for ‘Devil May Care’, the first four results are in non-ebook formats.
But here is the main problem. I really like the works of Neal Stephenson and I’ve been looking forward to reading his new book ‘Anathem’. I’m making an effort to buy as many new books in e-book format because they take up less space in my flat, are more portable and with the Sony e-reader, there is little difference between that screen and the printed page.
Also, downloading an ebook really does tickle the part of the monkey brain that desires instant gratification. Now waiting for the postman to drop an Amazon package through my letterbox and no need to go hunting for a copy (that may not be in stock) in physical bookshops.
But of course, ‘Anathem‘ is not in the Waterstones e-book store.
If I were an American I could buy it from the Sony library with no problems, but because of what I assume is licensing concerns it’s not available in the UK. Actually there is very little in the Waterstones library that I am interested in reading, it has quite a limited selection and as mentioned earlier the search mechanism discourages browsing.
At least I assume that it’s the licensing that is the problem - It is possible that Waterstones could be purposefully limiting the number of ebooks that they ’stock’ in order to determine demand. Or perhaps, for some reason, they want the e-reader to fail.
So they have a lost sale. If I weren’t such a rabid fan of Stephenson’s books I wouldn’t now go and buy the physical object, I’d just not bother.
I quite fancied reading ‘Apache‘, but it’s not available as an e-book and I don’t desire to read it enough to buy it in hardback.
One lost sale right there.
Electronic bits after all do not respect boundaries - It’s how I’ve seen, loved and evangelised ‘Burn Notice‘ before it’s show on UK TV. It’s why I make my book (and forthcoming sequel) available for download. Everyone who enjoys a book gets to appreciate the author and so will be more likely to buy other books by them.
By limiting the amount of readable material you are cutting your market. Can someone tell me how that makes sense?
It’s no wonder the torrent sites are doing a fine business, to take traffic away from them the legitimate companies need to concentrate on making the user experience of getting the content as easy and painless as possible. It’s the reason why I download my music from iTunes rather than bittorrent it, pure convenience and the satisfaction that comes from doing the right thing
Anyway, I’ve sent Waterstones an email, so I’ll be interested in their reply.
09.26.08
Auction Houses
I’m currently thinking about why Auction Houses in MMORPGs don’t act in the same way as they do in real life.
Is it because the way things are done at present make it easier for game companies to cope with the problem of in-game inflation?
